The Lost Symbol

October 27, 2009 at 9:22 am (Reads)

symbolThe Lost Symbol by Dan Brown


Dan Brown gets a lot of flack for being a hack writer.  I even read a collection of the 20 worst things he had ever written during his career as a writer, and I have to admit, it’s pretty bad.  The thing is, the guy knows how to put together an intriguing thriller, so part of me wonders how much of those articles are meant to expose how bad of a writer he really is, and how much of them are motivated by jealousy.  I’m a firm believer in the story as story, and nothing else, and I have to admit, Dan Brown tells a good story.

Now, this isn’t to say that I don’t have issues with Dan Brown as a writer.  For one, I’m a little amazed that Robert Langdon is still the mighty skeptic who has to go through all these ridiculous hoops before he believes in something that tons of people are telling him is actually true.  In Angels & Demons, he spent a lot of time telling people how the Illuminati was more symbolic than real, and then he found out that — GASP! — they’re real!  In The Da Vinci Code, he told us that the Opus Dei was a legend, not fact, but after traipsing over Rome for three days, he came to find that — SHOCK! — they were real!  So when he’s faced with a Masonic legend that lots of people are telling him is real, and not symbolic, don’t you think he might take a little less convincing?  No, because apparently Robert Langdon has a mass of wet noodles for a brain.

My biggest issues with The Lost Symbol have to do with the characters, anyway.  They’re wildly inconsistent.  They’re all terribly smart, and know a little bit about everything, and are confident to a fault, but suddenly they become complete imbeciles, forget everything they know, and doubt themselves when it’s convenient to move the plot forward.  Afterward, they go back to being their normal selves, like nothing happened to change who they are.  I understand that characterization is often sacrificed for plot in thrillers, but I would at least ask that the characters remain consistent throughout the story, hey?

The story is entertaining, and about as deep and as relevant as anything else that Dan Brown has written.  If you didn’t like his other books, then this one won’t win you over, but if you enjoy a thrilling story of conspiracies, mysteries, and adventure, then there are worse books to read than The Lost Symbol.


  1. Chris said,

    I started this on Sunday evening, but wasn’t able to read any last night do to another obligation, so I’m only about 100 or so pages in.

    I liked all his other books. I know that it’s fiction and all, and that some of his stuff, though grounded in truth, is really stretched to make it work with the fiction, but it is very entertaining, and they are easy reads, short chapters, always cliffhanging.

  2. Isaac said,

    Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that as one of his skills. He has enough characters doing different things in different places that he always manages to end one chapter on a cliffhanger, and then jump off to another character in the next chapter, which in turn ends on a cliffhanger, etc. etc. For someone like me, who likes to stop reading at a logical point, it makes it hard to put the book down.

  3. Chris said,

    Exactly, then you look up and it’s 2:30 in the morning.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: